A critical vulnerability was discovered in React Server Components (Next.js). Our systems remain protected but we advise to update packages to newest version. Learn More

Magnus Rahl
Apr 14, 2011
  3143
(0 votes)

Property problems in DynamicContentBase / Control-based Dynamic content

In EPiServer CMS 6 R2 there is a new possibility to easily create Dynamic Content plugins from (User)Controls just by decorating them with an attribute. The idea has been implemented outside EPiServer for previous versions, for example here. The new “official” approach is described in this tech note.

State storage

Dynamic content plugins are required to persist their state (if any, you could implement stateless dynamic content which for example fetches information from a fixed resource) as a string. In the “classic” pattern you implement the state serialization yourself.

In the Control-based pattern the Framework does this for you. All you need to do is to give your Control public properties of any type that inherit PropertyData and they will be persisted (currently there’s a bug with PropertyXhtmlString though). There are also some shortcuts for strings, integers etc., read more in the tech note.

The design of this state storage isn’t optimal for all situations though…

Problems with state storage and adding properties

The state storage of Control-based properties is handled by the EPiServer.DynamicContent.DynamicContentAdapter<T> generic class, inheriting from DynamicContentBase in the same namespace. The latter contains the code persisting the state and what it does is to loop over the properties and store a base64-encoded string for each, separating the substrings with pipes (‘|’).

Upon deserialization the properties are again looped over and the state string is split and decoded. But if you have added properties to your class “above” any of the exiting properties in the class the state will be restored to the wrong property! This is because the properties are not distinguished by anything other than their order.

So if you would decide to update your dynamic content by adding, say, a Heading property and place that at the top of the file (because you want it at the top of the Dynamic content editor) all your existing inserted dynamic content would be reduced to a smoking pile of junk, more or less.

Lesson learned

Don’t add properties to dynamic content plugins based on DynamicContentBase that is already in use. Or if you have to, add them last in the class. Or override the State property (not possible for Control-based DC). Or start out with your own implementation and state storage that you can do your best to future-proof and make backwards-compatible updates in.

Apr 14, 2011

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP: Learning Optimizely Just Got Easier: Introducing the Optimizely Learning Centre

On the back of my last post about the Opti Graph Learning Centre, I am now happy to announce a revamped interactive learning platform that makes...

Graham Carr | Jan 31, 2026

Scheduled job for deleting content types and all related content

In my previous blog post which was about getting an overview of your sites content https://world.optimizely.com/blogs/Per-Nergard/Dates/2026/1/sche...

Per Nergård (MVP) | Jan 30, 2026

Working With Applications in Optimizely CMS 13

💡 Note:  The following content has been written based on Optimizely CMS 13 Preview 2 and may not accurately reflect the final release version. As...

Mark Stott | Jan 30, 2026

Experimentation at Speed Using Optimizely Opal and Web Experimentation

If you are working in experimentation, you will know that speed matters. The quicker you can go from idea to implementation, the faster you can...

Minesh Shah (Netcel) | Jan 30, 2026